Fashion News | Hers Today | Smartly Curated Lifestyle and Culture

The Truth about Blondes

-

March 14, 2026

Blondes. They’re said to have more fun and turn more heads on the street for their eye-catching ‘dos. We’ve been told men can’t help but love golden-haired ladies, who’ve embodied glamour from the earliest Hollywood days to modern times. Marilyn Monroe, Dolly Parton, and Gwen Stefani are just a few famous blondes that are irresistibly loved by women and men alike. Chances are you are personally a fan of an iconic blonde or have long thought about becoming one yourself. But being blonde comes with a price… like dealing with dumb blonde comments and many long and expensive trips to the hair salon. Still, there are some surprising benefits of living life as a blonde. Would you turn to the light side if it could impact your sex life or make you more money? Hair color may seem like a small detail but being blonde can have more consequences than you’d think — good and bad. Here’s the truth about blondes.

Men do prefer blondes

If the title didn’t tip you off, the movie Gentlemen Prefer Blondes suggested to viewers that men were particularly into light-haired ladies. We get it though. With Lorelei Lee played by the blonde Marilyn Monroe, even a die-hard brunette lover would swoon. While we’ve been told men love blondes, most of us have turned the other cheek, considering it just a stereotype. Who would have thought that science actually proved this expression to be true? In a study conducted by The Journal of Social Psychology, 110 men were showed pictures of women with different hair colors and were asked to rate them on attractiveness, health, dating potential, and parenting ability. The findings proved that men viewed the women with light hair to be more attractive, have better health, and appear more youthful. The study also showed that men base complex relationship decisions on a woman’s appearance. So, yes, ladies! Guys are judging your looks to decide whether or not you are a good life partner. If you thought all the time spent visiting the salon to get that luscious light hue or shopping for the perfect outfit went unnoticed, you were wrong all along.

Blondes get paid more

Perhaps you can brush off that blondes have more fun, but what if we told you they make more dough? A study conducted in 2010 by the Queensland University of Technology examined 13,000 Caucasian women and led to one eye-opening conclusion — blonde women get paid more (via Forbes). And it wasn’t just a dollar more here and there. Their experiment concluded that blonde women make 7 percent more income. That means if you have a salary of $50,000, a blonde worker doing the same job might make $3,500 more than you.

This isn’t the only study that proved this phenomenon. An experiment performed by Cornell University had waitresses complete an online survey about their physical characteristics, self-perceptions, and tip income. The findings concluded that blondes accrued more income than their red-headed, brunette, or black-haired counterparts. But it doesn’t stop there. Even in a different 60-day study, dark-haired participants were asked to change their hair color and record their tips in a real work-like setting. The women received significantly more tips while blonde. Blondes really do have more funds!

Blondes are better in bed

Sex is an important part of a relationship and can help deepen the connection between two people. You can learn a lot about yourself through your sex life and whether you explore new things or stick to the same ol’ routine. But did you know that your hair color has an influence over your romantic life?

In a survey of 1,500 men (via the Daily Mail), women with blonde hair were said to be the best in bed. The survey found that 36 percent of men said that blonde women were the best at sex. Meanwhile, 31 percent of men thought of brunettes as the best in bed. But before all you dark-haired beauties call bologna, there are some other notable findings from the survey that you may want to hear. The men in the same survey also said that brunettes were better kissers and more sensual.

Blondes take longer to get ready

They say beauty is pain but we say beauty is simply time-consuming — especially when it comes to a woman’s morning routine. Shaving, blow-drying, applying make-up, and curling your hair does not happen instantly!

Glamour shared a study conducted by Goody that found blonde women take an average of six minutes longer than women with darker hair to get ready. It may not seem like much time but over a week that’s 40-some minutes. The study also concluded that 75 percent of blondes stick to the same beauty regimen daily. Brunettes, on the other hand, were more likely to go out of the house without doing their hair or makeup at all. Whether you lighten your hair monthly and stay true to a strict make up routine or you go out bare-faced is totally a personal decision, but we’re sure all women look gorg either way!

Blondes have higher IQs

We’ve all heard more dumb blonde jokes in our lifetime than we’ve probably wanted to. Maybe they encouraged a good laugh, but jokes are jokes after all. How much truth do they really hold? In fact, dumb blonde jokes aren’t very accurate because blondes carry the highest IQs of all the hair colors. That’s right, listen up to this one.

An experiment conducted at the Ohio State University studied 10,878 women on their smarts. The findings were quite interesting. Of all the hair colors, blondes had the highest IQ with an average of 103.2. Close behind were brunettes with an average IQ of 102.7. Then came red heads at 101.2 and black-haired women with an average of 100.5. Blonde women were also more likely to be geniuses and less likely to have a low IQ than any women with other hair colors. Hold onto this piece of juicy information, blondies, and wow the crowd the next time some hotshot tries to tell a blonde joke. Tell ’em who’s the smartest!

Blondes are helped more often

In the 21st century, feminism is the magic word. Although we love a guy that will sweep us off our feet, women are fully functioning, powerful beings who definitely don’t need a man. But if you were to drop a belonging, do you think your hair color would influence a man’s likeliness to help return it to you?

Men’s Health shared an experiment performed by a group of French scientists at the University of South Brittany that had young women wear a tight white tee and one of three wigs with blonde, brown, or black hair. They instructed the women to walk in front of a male and drop a glove to see if he alerted the woman of the lost item or not. The findings were quite astonishing. The male pedestrians notified the blondes 76 percent of the time, whereas the brunettes were only given the glove at a rate of 59 percent. The women with black hair were only told they’d dropped their glove 57 percent of the time. This can perhaps be explained by men’s tendency to associate blonde hair with youth and health, which are often connected to fertility. So once again, gentlemen really do prefer blondes.

Blondes have more sex and think about it more often

You’ve probably heard that men think about sex every seven seconds. Although this is a myth, a majority of men do actually think about sex several times a day while most women think about it several times a week (via GQ). We’ve already covered that blondes are reportedly better in bed and them allegedly thinking about sex more may help explain why.

Glamour reported that dating site Match.com’s Singles in America survey revealed that blonde women are having the most sex. Yep, they’re also reportedly thinking about sex more than women of any other hair color: 27 percent of single blonde women ponder the idea of sex several times a week with brunettes following at 24 percent. Thinking about sex more often likely encourages you to get down and dirty, and experiencing more sex can probably make you better at it altogether. They do say practice make perfect, after all.

Endless shades of blonde

Hairdressers have probably heard more times than they can count, “I want to be blonde!” And after reading this article, many more women may be inspired to take the plunge. But blonde isn’t just one flat color. While we’re unclear on a total count for all the blonde shades out there, Matrix shared 24 of the top shades in 2018.

Platinum blonde is at the top of Matrix’s list and is perhaps one of the most desired shades of blonde for its Barbie-like resemblance. It is also one of the most difficult blondes to maintain. Lady Gaga is known for her icy-white mane, and others like Kylie Jenner, Jennifer Lawrence, and Miley Cyrus have all gone platinum at some point (via Insider). But platinum blonde isn’t for everyone, and that’s where the darker shades of blonde come in clutch. Taylor Swift, for instance, has sported a honey blonde bob, and Jennifer Aniston’s legendary medium-blonde shade has been a fan favorite for decades.

For those with darker skin and darker eyes, blonde can be a good option too. Beyoncé has rocked her own shade of chocolate blonde with brunette roots that fade into long golden locks.

Blondes marry richer men

Attention all women who dream of marrying a millionaire! In a study conducted by the University of Queensland, researchers found that blondes married men who made 6 percent more earnings than the husbands of other hair colors (via Business Insider). So while blondes are making 7 percent more themselves, between a blonde and her husband, they could be earning a total of 13 percent more income. The president of the International Blondes Association, Olga Uskova, informed News.com.au: “Blondes have wealthier husbands because we are more fun and outgoing, and men are more attracted to us.” She added, “Blondes also have a lot of confidence so we can date men who are powerful or important.”

While looks aren’t everything, being confident with your looks is likely to impact your relationship, job, and overall well-being. People with high self-esteem are also found to be happier so this can allow them to be more attractive overall. If your blonde hair makes you feel better about yourself, you’re likely to attract an umbrella of other positive outcomes like tying the knot with a wealthy man.

Blondes have more estrogen

Bottle blondes may reap many benefits of being a blonde but not this one. Science shows that natural blondes have more estrogen in their DNA (via Fox 5 Atlanta). Estrogen is the main female sex hormone and controls the reproductive system along with helping the development of secondary sex characteristics. Higher levels of estrogen can contribute to smaller facial features like a petite nose and a pointed chin. Because of having higher levels of estrogen, blonde women may appear more feminine and have less body hair.

It may sound like blondes have the DNA of golden goddesses but this only applies to natural blondes, who are, in fact, very rare. On the flip side, Medical News Today explained that high levels of estrogen can have some negative effects for women like heavy periods and weight gain. So blondes may enjoy some incredible benefits stemming from a higher estrogen level but other effects are not so pretty.

Natural blondes are very rare

Yes, there are plenty of blondes in this world, but most of them are far from natural. In fact, Natalia Ilyin writes in her book Blonde Like Me: The Roots of the Blonde Myth in Our Culture that only 2 percent of the population is naturally blonde. Blonde hair is caused by a very small genetic mutation in your DNA that alters the letter A to G in the sea of 3 billion possible letters (via National Geographic). The change is reportedly responsible for those beautiful, sought-after golden locks that many parents probably hope never darken on their little ones.

But most children with that ridiculously cute white-blonde hair often experience darker locks by the time they turn 10 years old (via Live Science). The determinant of hair color is melanin — a dark pigment found in the hair, skin, and eyes. Melanin is the same component that determines whether or not you tan in the sun. The darkening of hair happens because the genes that determine hair color do not stay constant throughout one’s life. So cherish that natural blonde while you can, little ones, because you may have to convert to being a bottle-blonde later on in life.

Blonde women are more likely to hold a position of power

We already squashed the “dumb blonde” stigma so this one shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise. Forty-eight percent of women who are chief executives at S&P 500 companies have blonde hair, according to a group of researchers at the yearly Academy of Management Meeting held in 2016 (via HuffPost). And this isn’t just a random occurrence. Experts believe there may be more strategy or explanation behind this than most would think. Blonde is thought to give a softer look to women and can give them more leeway in a dominating job role.

Jennifer Berdahl presented these power blonde findings during the Academy of Management Meeting in ’16. Berdahl explained, “If the package is feminine, disarming and childlike, you can get away with more assertive, independent and [stereotypically] masculine behavior.” Having blonde hair can help take the intensity off of a female CEO and relay a more favorable appearance. Light hair is also associated with youth and health, which can give blonde women a leg up in their careers.

Blondes have more sexual partners

One of the best parts of Sex in the City is living vicariously through Samantha Jones’ sex life. We love watching her captivate men and down martinis with her sultry look-at-me persona. She’s always on the hunt for men, and it’s no coincidence she’s the one that has blonde locks out of the four BFFs. Channel your Samantha Jones spirit animal for this one ’cause it’s gonna get steamy!

Glamour shared a survey from Match.com that found women with blonde hair had more sexual partners. The results showed blondes had an average of 10.1 sexual partners with redheads close behind at 9.4 partners. Brunettes were in last with 7.8 partners. That’s not all though. The same survey found that blondes were most likely to have a one-night stand. Sixty percent of blondes admitted they had a one-night fling, followed by 58 percent of redheads and 51 percent of brunettes. We see a pattern going on here. Blondes are really living their best sex lives!

Blondes have more hair and lose more of it

Many people have nightmares about losing their hair. But in reality, we lose hair every day. Diane Minar, a senior scientist at Unilever, confirmed to Self that losing hair is normal and explained that the average person loses 50 to 100 strands of hair a day. The amount of hair you lose depends on your hair color because it determines how many individual hair strands are found on your head.

So who exactly is shedding the most strands? Blondies are losing the most hair, but, before you golden-hued ladies freak, you might be relieved to know that this is because blondes have the most hair. Minar stated that the average woman with blonde hair boasts more than 450,000 individual strands on her head, whereas a woman with black hair only has around 60,000. In the middle range sits brunettes and redheads.

So, there you have it. Blondes have more sex, more money, and apparently more hair. Let’s start a blonde revolution!

All the Cool Girls Get Fired – A Night with Laura Brown and Kristina O’Neill in London

admin

-

March 10, 2026

0

All the Cool Girls Get Fired – A Night with Laura Brown and Kristina O’Neill in London

On the coldest night in November, The Trouble Club brought together the brightest minds – women who had
come not for comfort, but for clarity. The event featured two figures who know the industry from the inside out: Laura Brown, former Editor-in-Chief of InStyle, and Kristina O’Neill, longtime Editor-in-Chief of WSJ Magazine. They were in London to speak about their new book: All the Cool Girls Get Fired, in conversation with The Trouble Club’s Owner and Director, Ellie Newton. Brown and O’Neill walked onstage with the ease of two women who have already lived through the worst of it and found something sharper on the other side. The tone was clear and exacting. They weren’t there to soothe anyone, but to describe what the reality of work really is, what happens when it ends, and what remains when the job disappears.

The Rise, the Shift, and the Firing
Before they became the names shaping major American magazines, Brown and O’Neill were interns, assistants,
and junior staffers – first in, last out, paid little, expected to endure a carousel of eccentric personalities.

Fashion media at the time was a place built on instinct, hierarchy, and the unspoken art of surviving rooms
where confidence mattered more than credentials. Brown, who arrived in New York with no contacts and an Australian accent that marked her as an outsider, learned early that the people who seemed intimidating weren’t always the ones with real authority. “You realise they’re just people,” she said. “Sometimes very talented, sometimes very fragile.” O’Neill, more internal in her style, built her career through a calm steadiness that made her indispensable to the editors she worked for. Their chemistry was visible even in their early days. One of the stories they shared – now part of their mutual mythology – was the Marc Jacobs show in September 2001. O’Neill had a legitimate seat; Brown walked in without one. They met in that charged atmosphere, the height of pre-digital fashion, where being in the room mattered as much as having something to say. For years, they rode the industry at its peak. Magazines controlled the conversation. Editors were gatekeepers. Influence was managed from the top. They produced work that travelled globally long before social platforms existed. “We were breaking the internet before the internet existed,” Brown joked. But nothing in media stays static – new platforms arrived.

They learned to think in multiple directions: print, digital, celebrity, commerce. They rebuilt roles around storytelling rather than format. They kept moving while the ground shifted under them. But adaptation didn’t protect them from the larger truth. When contraction occurs, institutions don’t always distinguish between the competent and the exceptional. They cut for reasons that have nothing to do with merit. Brown was fired on Zoom in February 2022. She received the usual predictable clichés: restructuring, streamlining, reallocation. She took it in with a kind of calm that can only come from knowing exactly who she is. Within minutes, she told her team the line that has since become a central thesis of the book: “Your work is your own. Your value is your own. Don’t give that power away.”

O’Neill’s firing was in person. She walked into the meeting thinking she was presenting strategy, not concluding her tenure. When handed a stack of documents to sign, she declined. “Now?” she said. “No.” She texted Brown under the table: Getting the boot. Both women refused the theatre of institutional decorum. They wanted the truth, not the performance. “Say it plainly,” O’Neill said. “I got fired.”

They understood something most people take years to absorb: you recover faster when you stop pretending.

What Women Like Them Learn the Hard Way
This was the section of the evening where the room leaned in. Brown and O’Neill were offering clarity.

The first lesson: identity cannot rest on a job title. When a role becomes the centre of gravity, the firing feels like an erasure. If your self-definition is too narrow, the loss becomes larger than it needs to be.

The second: value does not come from institutions. It is not conferred. It is not borrowed. It is not given by a boss or a masthead. Value is portable. It belongs to the person, not the role.

The third: reinvention requires honesty, not performance. You cannot rebuild from denial. You can only rebuild
from clarity.

Brown’s reinvention began before the firing. She had already registered her media company. She knew she
didn’t want to anchor her future to a single structure again. After leaving InStyle, she stepped back and reassessed what she wanted her work to mean. She wasn’t in a hurry. She was building toward something that had room for her full range, not just her editorial past. O’Neill’s reinvention was lateral and clean. She moved into Sotheby’s as Head of Media, proving that editorial intelligence travels far outside the magazine world. She didn’t change who she was. She simply applied her discipline to a new setting.

Both women made a distinction the audience understood immediately: power is something you hold; empowerment is something people like to talk about. The first is internal. The second is atmospheric. They prefer the first. Not because they failed. Because they were undeniably excellent in a forcibly changing environment that could no longer sustain excellence.

Lessons From Two Media Executives Who Survived the Cycle
As for the “cool girls,” the term isn’t about personality or aesthetics. It refers to the women who do the work:
competence, delivery, and visibility. The ones who carry the weight. The ones who deliver more than they’re
asked to. The ones who become indispensable, visible, central – and therefore, paradoxically, exposed when
the chopping block appears. Women who raise the standard in a workplace, and in doing so, inadvertently
make themselves the most exposed when circumstances change. The room carried its own stories. A woman with two MAs who has been looking for meaningful work for fifteen years. An HR director who spoke with precision: “Treat yourself as the business.” A renewables professional who has been fired, rehired, and remains unbending in her expectations of herself and others. They were proof that Brown and O’Neill weren’t describing theory – they were describing what many women already know. It was the reminder that will, intelligence, and discipline don’t evaporate with a job title.

Fired or not, the women who built something once will build again – and more often than not, they build something better.

About the Trouble Club: The Trouble Club is a community for people who love ideas, conversation and connection. We host world-class talks with leading female thinkers, writers and experts on subjects ranging from psychology, history and crime to literature, politics, the environment, media, current affairs, global issues and identity. Alongside our events, we bring members together for dinners, debates and news round-ups – creating space for intelligent, curious people to engage with the ideas shaping the world today.
https://thetroubleclub.com

The Road to French Open 2025 Finals

admin

-

March 9, 2026

0

The red clay of Roland Garros turns every match into a test of grit. Players slide across the court like dancers in a dusty ballet. As we eye the French Open 2025 finals, excitement builds for battles that could redefine tennis stars. This Grand Slam stands alone on its slow, bouncy surface. It demands endurance that grass or hard courts rarely require. Top players like Carlos Alcaraz and Iga Swiatek enter with strong form from early 2025 events. Their recent wins on clay hint at epic showdowns ahead. What makes these finals special? We predict matchups based on past runs at Roland Garros and current skills. Young talents push veterans hard. Storylines like a possible Alcaraz-Djokovic clash add fire. Expect drama, upsets, and clay magic that fans crave. Contenders in the Men’s Singles Draw: Reigning Kings and Rising Challengers Top seeds shape the men’s side at the French Open 2025. Carlos Alcaraz leads as the favorite after his 2024 Madrid Masters sweep. He topspin drives deep, wearing down foes over long rallies. Novak Djokovic, at 38, chases a record 25th major. His 2024 clay results show sharp returns and flawless footwork. Rafael Nadal, if healthy, could return for one last hurrah. His 14 Roland Garros titles loom large. These vets adapt well to clay’s grind. Alcaraz mixes pace with angles. Djokovic exploits weak serves. Nadal’s heavy spin rules baseline wars. Their strategies build from strong spring seasons. Rising stars eye breakthroughs in the 2025 draw. Jannik Sinner, now 23, crushed rivals at the 2024 Rome Masters. His flat groundstrokes cut through clay defense. Ben Shelton, the American powerhouse, adds serve-and-volley flair. At 22, he reached the 2024 Paris semis. His big game tests endurance in five-set ties. Another name: Holger Rune from Denmark. His all-court style shone in junior clays. Recent ATP wins prove he’s ready for majors. Young players face tough odds in long matches. But their speed and hunger could topple seeds. Watch for stamina in quarterfinal grinds. Clay success hinges on key skills. Sliding lets you chase wide balls without slips. Topspin keeps shots high over the net. Endurance tops the list. Five-set epics drain energy fast. Strong legs and quick recovery win days. Mental focus matters too. Clay rewards patience. Players who stay calm after errors push deeper. Master the slide: Practice pivots on red dirt. Build topspin: Loop forehands to control bounce. Train endurance: Run hill sprints for that final push. These traits separate finalists from the pack in 2025. Women’s Singles: The Battle for Parisian Supremacy Iga Swiatek rules women’s clay like few others. The Pole won the 2024 French Open in straight sets. Her return game disrupts serves early. In late rounds, foes try variety to break her rhythm. Drop shots or net rushes aim to pull her forward. Swiatek counters with laser passing shots. Over two years, she boasts a 92% win rate on clay. That’s 78 wins from 85 matches. Her consistency crushes hopefuls. Yet challengers rise to shake things up at Roland Garros 2025. Aryna Sabalenka brings raw power. Her 2024 Stuttgart title showed booming serves on slow courts. Coco Gauff, 21, blends speed with craft. She reached the 2024 semis here. Her defense turns defense into offense fast. Elena Rybakina offers big-hitting precision. From Kazakhstan, she upset seeds in Madrid 2024. Her style contrasts Swiatek’s grind. Power players like Sabalenka blast winners. Gauff uses angles to extend points. Rybakina slices serves low. Each tests the queen differently. Think of Jelena Ostapenko’s 2017 surprise win. The Latvian stormed through with aggressive play. Such breaks add spice to 2025 predictions. Early rounds set the tone on clay. Save energy by winning quick. A straight-sets start builds confidence. Players often rush shots in openers. They underestimate slow conditions. That leads to errors and fatigue later. Psychological edges grow from smart play. Conserve legs for deep runs. Avoid forcing winners too soon. Mistake here, and the draw bites back. Predicting the Path to the Final: Draw Analysis and Potential Upsets Draws at Roland Garros split into quadrants. Top seeds anchor safe zones. But clay specialists cluster in tough spots. The bottom half might pack French wildcards like Gael Monfils. Early clashes brew high drama. Quarterfinals could see Alcaraz face Rune early. Top sections favor form over rank. Sinner might dodge Djokovic till semis. Weather—rain delays—shuffles schedules. John McEnroe once called the French draw a “lottery.” Vets like him note clay’s unpredictability amps risks. Upsets strike often here. In 2023, a qualifier toppled a top-10 seed in round two. Weather turns courts slick. Minor injuries flare under sun. Hot days sap power hitters. Cool rains favor grinders. These shifts flip seeds aside. Form trumps seeding at Roland Garros. A hot streak means confidence. Seeded protection helps, but rust loses matches. Take 2024: An unseeded player beat a third seed. Fresh legs and bold play won out. In 2025, watch mid-tier risers. Rain: Slows play, boosts defense. Injuries: Tape-ups signal trouble. Crowd: Home fans rattle visitors. These factors spark chaos in the path to finals. The Final Showdown: What It Takes to Lift the Coupe des Mousquetaires Predicted men’s final: Alcaraz vs. Sinner. They met in the 2024 semis, split sets. Alcaraz edged it with better clay movement. On all surfaces, Alcaraz leads 4-2. Clay tilts his way—his spin bites deeper. Sinner adjusts with flatter shots next time. Five-set clay tests limits. Past finals ran over four hours. Tactics evolve from those wars. For the grinder like Alcaraz, vary pace. Force errors with deep returns. Against aggressors, step inside the baseline. Aggressive types like Sinner should serve wide. Rush the net after short balls. Clay slows returns, so volley early. Serve placement counts huge. Aim corners to jam returners. Use kick serves to the body on clay bounce. The Philippe-Chatrier Court roars for finals. Packed stands create a wall of noise. Winners etch names in history; losers face what-ifs. Pressure peaks in tiebreaks. Breathe deep, trust shots. Clay rewards the steady heart. Swiatek might face Sabalenka in women’s final. Their 2024 clay head-to-head: Swiatek up 3-1. Sabalenka’s power pushed close sets. Across surfaces, Swiatek wins 7-4. But finals demand peak focus. Sabalenka could blast through if Swiatek tires. Conclusion: The Anticipated Narrative of Roland Garros 2025 Key themes emerge for the French Open 2025 finals. Youth rises with Alcaraz and Sinner challenging vets. Clay purity shines through endurance battles. Swiatek’s reign faces real tests from power hitters. Draws promise upsets that shake seeds. Predictions point to Alcaraz lifting the men’s trophy in a five-set thriller. Swiatek claims another women’s crown. Watch for that changing guard moment. These finals blend history and fresh faces. Mark your calendar for Roland Garros. The clay will tell gripping tales. Tune in and feel the pulse of tennis.

Scottish Open: The Links Sets the Stage for Final Round

admin

-

March 4, 2026

0

Scottish Open: The Links Sets the Stage for Final Round

This year’s ISPS HANDA Women’s Scottish Open has unfolded against the pristine turf of Dundonald Links, where hometown talents meet global names. As the penultimate event before the AIG Women’s Open, the Ayrshire coast has transformed into a proving ground – for nerve, narrative, and national pride.

Few players have embodied this duality than Scotland’s own Hannah Darling and Lottie Woad, both making their Scottish Open debuts. Darling, fresh off a decorated amateur career and celebrated tenure at the University of South Carolina, now turns pro on familiar turf. “I’ve always dreamed of this moment – stepping into the field not as a hopeful junior, but as a competitor representing Scotland at home,” she shared in the press tent earlier this week, her voice composed but unmistakably enthusiastic. Woad, meanwhile, arrives trailing a blaze of recent form – victory at the KPMG Women’s Irish Open, a T3 finish at Evian, and, perhaps most memorably, her win at the Augusta National Women’s Amateur. “Playing at Dundonald feels like coming full circle,” she said. “The wind, the greens, the dunes – they’re in my bones”. The Scottish public has responded with visible affection. From hand-painted signs dotting the gallery ropes to the spontaneous applause echoing across tee boxes, it’s clear this year’s event is more than a stop on the LPGA-LET schedule. It’s a moment of homecoming for two prodigies whose talent was first tested under these very skies – and whose futures may very well be forged here again.

The Course: Modern Classicism and Coastal Reckoning

Redesigned with a staggering £25 million investment, Dundonald Links now stands not just as a course, but as a contemporary cathedral of links golf. Rooted in traditional design while pushing the edge of modern sustainability and playability, its windswept fescue, pot bunkers, and firm-running fairways offer a test no simulator can replicate. The refinements – particularly to drainage and routing -have made the course more receptive to elite competition. “You have to play the land,” said one top-20 player. “There’s no disguising your game here. Dundonald rewards purity and punishes hesitation.” Compared to other European mainstays like Le Golf National or Evian Resort Golf Club, Dundonald feels rawer, more elemental. It lacks the manicured theatricality of inland championship venues but offers, instead, authenticity: unfiltered, unsheltered, and unrelenting. Its position just before next week’s AIG Women’s Open at Royal Porthcawl elevates its strategic importance. While the Welsh venue has history on its side, Dundonald asserts its value through challenge. Royal Porthcawl will likely offer softer surfaces and slightly more forgiving roughs; here in Ayrshire, however, it’s the wind that shapes destiny.

Rounds One to Three: Surprises, Stability, and Shifting Sands

Three days into competition, the leaderboard at Dundonald has been a study in volatility. Nelly Korda, world No. 1, started steady with a composed 69 but saw her rhythm disrupted in Friday’s crosswind. She bounced back with a 67 on Saturday, reasserting her place among the contenders – but not without bruises. Among the week’s early surprises was Hye-Jin Choi, who opened with a blistering 65 – five birdies, no bogeys – and briefly led the field before a double on 14 in round two knocked her back to T11. Still, her putting stroke remains among the most confident in the field. Mimi Rhodes, one of England’s more understated talents, thrilled local fans with a career-best 66 in round two, vaulting her into solo fourth by Saturday morning. Her approach game has been metronomic, and should she maintain this level, her maiden LPGA top-10 is all but assured. Ayaka Furue, the 2022 Scottish Open winner, has remained a model of consistency. Her opening three rounds (68-69-68) show little variance, underscoring why she remains one of the tour’s most quietly efficient players. Should the winds pick up Sunday, her low-ball flight could prove decisive. On the opposite end, defending champion Lauren Coughlin struggled to find her putting groove. A four-putt on Friday’s 12th hole left her visibly rattled, though she clawed her way back with a composed 70 on Saturday. She sits just inside the top 20. Georgia Hall looked sharp in round one but faded to T32 after losing five strokes to the field around the green. Charley Hull, playing through a recent viral illness, showed flashes of brilliance, especially on Saturday with birdies at 3, 5, and 17.

Day Three: Shifts in Momentum and a British Surge

With the coastal wind softening and turf conditions firming underfoot, Round 3 at Dundonald Links played out like a calculated duel between resolve and rhythm. Lottie Woad, the British prodigy making her Scottish Open debut, carded a composed 67 (-5) to climb decisively to the top of the leaderboard at -17. For a player so new to the professional circuit, her capacity to hold composure over three rounds of testing links conditions is already being studied by veteran caddies and coaches alike. Sharing the spotlight just two shots adrift were Nanna Koerstz Madsen (Denmark) and South Korea’s seasoned Sung Young Kim. Both delivered identically sharp -5 rounds to settle at -15 heading into Sunday. Matching their consistency, Hyo Joo Kim of South Korea posted a scorching 66 (-6), placing herself at -14, just one back from the tie for second — and now very much in striking distance. World No. 1 Nelly Korda, though less aggressive than in earlier rounds, held steady with a -2, preserving her place at -12. Her swing remained textbook clean, yet her measured pace suggests she may be conserving intensity for a final-day charge. Further down, South Africa’s Paula Reto surged into contention with a -6 round, taking solo sixth at -9. Meanwhile, Hye-Jin Choi (KOR) recorded one of the lowest rounds of the day with a -7, tying for seventh alongside American Sarah Schmelzel (-3 overall on the day), both finishing at -8. Australia’s Cassie Porter and Thailand’s Ariya Jutanugarn rounded out the top ten, both posting -3 and -5 respectively, to finish Saturday at -7. This evolving leaderboard has set up a final-day showdown filled with contrasting styles: power hitters, shot-shapers, and tactical grinders – all converging on a redesigned course that demands mental clarity as much as ball control.

What Awaits in the Final Round

The final day promises drama, wind shifts, and inevitably a turning of the tide. Nelly Korda enters with a one-shot lead, but as history shows, leads at Dundonald are ephemeral. The closing holes – especially the par-3 15^th and dogleg-left 18^th; demand more than mere execution. They demand memory, instinct, and a touch of fearlessness. Furue and Choi will undoubtedly apply pressure early. Both have proven they can post low numbers in tough conditions. And with weather forecasts suggesting a return to gusty crosswinds by mid-afternoon, scoring early may be the only way to survive late. From a hometown perspective, all eyes will remain on Woad. She have shown hints of composure that suggest longer arcs of success. A strong Sunday could solidify her place in Europe’s future Solheim Cup discussions. With $300,000 on the line for the winner – and a guaranteed surge in CME Globe points – this Sunday is not merely a finishing act. It’s the final rehearsal before the major stage at Royal Porthcawl, and for many, it could define their 2025 season.

AIG Women’s Open – Day 1 Recap

admin

-

February 27, 2026

0

Day 1 of the 2025 AIG Women’s Open delivered classic golf set up as Japan’s Sakura Takeda and Akie Okayama surged into a shared lead with matching rounds of 67 (-5). Their precision play in breezy conditions positioned them atop the leaderboard at Royal Porthcawl Golf Club. The pair navigated the course with contrasting momentum. Okayama, in her first appearance at the championship since 2018, recovered from a bogey at the 1st with five birdies on the front nine. Her closing nine – eight pars and a birdie at 17 – was calm, measured, and mistake-free. The 67 marked her career-best round in the championship by three strokes. Takeda opened with a birdie pitch-in at the 1st and found six more birdies across her card. Her lone error came at the par-5 9th – statistically the easiest hole on the course – here she made double bogey. Still, the round confirmed her growing stature after finishing tied-second at this year’s U.S. Women’s Open.

Also in contention is Miyu Yamashita, whose 68 (-4) featured the lowest front-nine score of the day: 31, built on four consecutive birdies (4–7) and an eagle at the 9th. She joined a leaderboard marked by Japanese consistency – six of the top thirteen players after round one represent Japan. The broader scoring showed that Royal Porthcawl offered opportunities despite gusty intervals. The field average was 73.02, with 50 players returning under-par rounds. 73 of 144 players scored level-par or better, marking one of the more accessible opening days at the AIG in recent years. Still, the course had its teeth. The par 4, 16th played as the most difficult hole with a stroke average of 4.47, yielding only five birdies versus 49 bogeys and nine doubles. The par-5 9th played as the most generous, producing seven eagles and 75 birdies – but also caught out Hannah Green (8) and Cossie Porter (9).

From a historical lens, the data offers a measured reminder: only one of the past 17 champions has led or co-led after round one. Conversely, each of the past five winners started three to five shots behind. Comeback wins remain not only possible but common. Their rounds were part of a broader trend: six of the top 13 players after Thursday’s play were from Japan. For Okayama, this marked her return to the championship after a seven-year absence. Her start – bogey at the 1st – was quickly countered with five birdies on the front nine. A clean back nine, punctuated with a birdie at 17, brought her home in 67, the best AIG round of her career to date. Takeda’s path to five-under was less even, but equally effective. After holing out for birdie at the 1st, she made six more birdies over the round. A double-bogey at the par 5, 9th – despite being the day’s easiest hole – was her only dropped shot. Takeda’s performance follows a strong runner-up finish at the U.S. Women’s Open earlier this year.

Close behind was fellow Japanese player Miyu Yamashita, whose 68 (-4) matched her best score in this championship. After a bogey at the 1st, she went on a tear with four straight birdies from holes 4 to 7, then eagled the 9th to post the day’s lowest front nine – 31 strokes. World No.1 Nelly Korda carded a steady 70 (-2), sitting T14, alongside several others. Korda struggled early with distance control but rallied with birdies at 11 and 14. Scottish Open winner Lottie Woad opened with an E. Her round was largely solid, though a double bogey at the par 4, 5th affected her early momentum, though she stabilised her round across the inward half. Sei Young Kim and Brooke Henderson both posted 69 (-3), positioning themselves cleanly for the second round. Both players managed the breezy afternoon with controlled shot-making and clean cards. The 9th was statistically the easiest hole of the day with a stroke average of 4.51. It yielded seven eagles and 75 birdies. However, it wasn’t without casualties: Hannah Green recorded an eight and Cossie Porter a nine.

In total, the course gave up 50 under-par rounds, and 73 players out of 144 returned level-par or better. The hardest hole was the par-4 16th, which averaged 4.47 and produced just five birdies against 49 bogeys and nine doubles. No player finished the day bogey-free. In the amateur race for the Smyth Salver, Paula Martin Sampedro, Jeneath Wong, and Carla Bernat lead, each carding an even-par 72. History suggests caution: only one of the last 17 champions has led or co-led after round one. As Friday’s wind builds, strategy will be tested – and the lead may shift as the Welsh weather. The cut line after Day 1 projects around +2, but with forecasted gusts up to 25 mph on Friday, that may shift. Players noted how Royal Porthcawl’s exposed layout magnifies wind direction and demands high-level ball flight control.

Australian Open 2026 Finals: Analyzing the Road to Melbourne Park

admin

-

February 9, 2026

0

Australian Open 2026 Finals: Analyzing the Road to Melbourne Park

The Australian Open always kicks off the tennis year with a bang. Fans pack Melbourne Park in January, ready for two weeks of high-stakes action. As we look ahead to 2026, the finals promise drama, upsets, and new heroes on the hard courts. Introduction: The Countdown to the 2026 Grand Slam Showdown The Enduring Legacy of the Australian Open The Australian Open stands as the first major tournament each year. It sets the pace for players chasing Grand Slam glory. Melbourne Park’s lively vibe, with its mix of sun and night lights, draws crowds from everywhere. This event has a rich history. Stars like Rod Laver and Margaret Court once ruled here. Today, it blends tradition with modern flair. The hard courts test speed and power right from the start. Players arrive fresh from off-season training. The tournament shapes rankings and egos early. Wins here boost confidence for the rest of the year. Why the 2026 Finals Matter: A Shifting Landscape Men’s tennis sees big changes by 2026. Veterans like Novak Djokovic may step back. Young guns such as Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner step up. Women’s side stays fierce too. Iga Świątek holds strong, but rivals like Aryna Sabalenka push hard. New faces could spark upsets. Expect a mix of experience and youth in the finals. Retirements open doors. Next-gen stars aim for their first titles. The 2026 finals could mark a turning point in the sport. Analyzing the Contenders: Men’s Singles Field for 2026 The Established Titans: Defending Their Territory Top seeds like Novak Djokovic, Carlos Alcaraz, and Jannik Sinner lead the pack. Djokovic owns nine Australian Open titles. His baseline game thrives on Melbourne’s courts. Alcaraz won in 2024 at age 20. By 2026, he’ll peak with explosive shots. Sinner took the 2025 crown. His serve and forehand dominate hard courts. These players share high seeding success. In the last five years, top three seeds reached semis 80% of the time. Djokovic’s record shows he adapts to heat and pace. Alcaraz brings variety with drops and lobs. Sinner’s consistency shines in long rallies. They all hunt a spot in the final. The Next Generation’s Ascent: Ready for the Breakthrough Rising stars like Ben Shelton and Alex de Minaur eye big runs. Shelton, now 23 in 2026, packs power serves over 130 mph. His US Open run in 2023 hints at major potential. De Minaur, an Aussie, knows Melbourne well. His speed covers the court fast. By 2026, he’ll hit his prime at 27. Look at Jacob Fearnley’s 2024 Next Gen Finals win. That junior success predicts AO breakthroughs. These players build stamina for five-set wars. Their strengths fit hard courts. Quick feet and big serves help in short points. Early wins in Australia prep them for the spotlight. Key Factors Influencing Men’s Success in Melbourne Heat in January tests endurance. Players must manage fluids and recovery. Past finals saw matches pause for temps over 100°F. Draw luck matters too. A tough early opponent can drain energy. Melbourne’s courts run medium-fast, favoring all-court players. Prep in Australia gives an edge. Training in Sydney or Brisbane builds match feel. Start with smaller events like Brisbane International. Stay hydrated with electrolyte drinks. Scout opponents via video analysis. Adjust to time zones two weeks early. These steps boost chances in the finals push. The Women’s Draw: Power, Precision, and Potential Unpredictability Reigning Dominance and New Threats Aryna Sabalenka defends her back-to-back titles. Her flat groundstrokes cut through Melbourne’s bounce. Iga Świątek, with four Slams, adds spin and defense. Coco Gauff, at 22 in 2026, grows into a threat. Her speed and returns pressure servers. Sabalenka’s power suits fast hard courts best. Świątek’s clay game adapts well. She reached the 2025 semis here. Gauff’s athleticism shines in night matches. Styles clash create fireworks. Power hitters like Sabalenka face retrievers like Świątek. This mix promises tight sets. The Dark Horses Poised for Deep Runs Players like Mirra Andreeva and Diana Shnaider lurk outside top five. Andreeva, 18 in 2026, has a strong serve and backhand. Her 2024 French Open quarters show grit. Shnaider’s returns break big servers often. At 22, she builds consistency. Both need power for Melbourne’s conditions. Focus on serve hold percentages. Dark horses win 85% of service games in upsets. Their return games force errors. These women could hit semis. Strong first serves keep them in rallies. Watch for their early momentum. The Mental Game on Rod Laver Arena Finals bring huge pressure. First-time players face doubts under lights. The crowd’s roar amps up nerves. Sports psychologist Jim Loehr says, “Champions reframe stress as excitement.” This mindset helps in tiebreaks. Women like Gauff learn from losses. Past finals taught Sabalenka to stay calm. Mental prep includes visualization drills. Breaks in play let minds reset. Handling errors quick defines winners. The arena tests resolve as much as strokes. The Path to the Final: Draw Analysis and Potential Matchups Navigating the Early Rounds: Avoiding Pitfalls Seeds protect top players in week one. But upsets happen fast. A bad draw means facing wild cards early. Build momentum with straight-set wins. The first week sets rhythm. Lucky losers fill gaps from retirements. Avoid fatigue from long matches. Rotate practice to save legs. Early exits kill final hopes. Predicted Quarter-Final Showdowns In men’s, expect Alcaraz vs. de Minaur. Alcaraz leads head-to-head 3-1. De Minaur’s home crowd pushes him, but Alcaraz’s variety wins in four. Sinner vs. Shelton pits serve against serve. Sinner’s 2025 win over Shelton predicts a straight-sets victory. Both hit big, but Sinner moves better. Women’s side: Świątek vs. Gauff. Świątek’s 4-2 edge favors her. Gauff’s speed tests defense in a three-setter. Sabalenka vs. Andreeva could surprise. Sabalenka’s power overwhelms, but Andreeva’s youth keeps it close. These matchups shape semis based on form. The Semifinal Crucible: Identifying the Toughest Routes Top seed Djokovic might draw Alcaraz in quarters if paths cross. That route tires legs for finals. Sinner faces easier early rounds but tough Europeans later. De Minaur’s section looks open, but depth adds risk. In women’s, Gauff’s half packs power hitters. Świątek’s side has more variety, easing her path. Challenging routes demand peak fitness. Round of 16 often weeds out seeds. Survivors reach the end stronger. Melbourne Park 2026: Venue Factors and Scheduling Insights Court Conditions: The Pace of Play Tennis Australia tweaks court speed yearly. Melbourne runs medium, helping baseliners. Finals see less wear, keeping balls low. Baseline players like Świątek thrive. Net rushers adapt with volleys. Pace favors aggressive returns. Grip changes from clay to hard test footing. Players adjust strings for bounce. Heat Management and Scheduling Innovations Melbourne heat hits hard in finals week. Roofs on big courts shield from sun. Matches start late to avoid peaks. 2026 plans include more indoor play. Hydration breaks every changeover help. Past years cut heat-related issues by 50%. Night sessions cool things down. Fans enjoy under lights without sweat. Fan Experience and Atmosphere Crowds energize players. Aussie fans cheer loud for locals. Night finals draw global viewers. Vibe mixes fun with tension. Food stalls and screens build hype. The roar in deciding points lifts underdogs. This setup makes finals unforgettable. Predicting the 2026 Australian Open Champions Men’s Final Prediction and Rationale Jannik Sinner claims the men’s title over Carlos Alcaraz. Sinner’s serve holds firm in five sets. Alcaraz pushes with speed, but errors creep in heat. Tactics favor Sinner’s consistency. He targets Alcaraz’s backhand early. This matchup tests endurance, with Sinner edging out 7-5 in the fifth. Sinner’s 2025 form carries over. At 25, he peaks for Slams. Women’s Final Prediction and Rationale Iga Świątek beats Aryna Sabalenka for the women’s crown. Świątek’s defense absorbs power. Sabalenka blasts winners, but rallies wear her down. Key battle: returns vs. serves. Świątek breaks twice in the second set. She wins 6-4, 4-6, 6-3. Świątek’s mental edge shines. Her all-court game fits Melbourne perfectly. Conclusion: The Legacy of the 2026 Finals Key Takeaways: What to Watch For in January Generational shifts dominate 2026. Young stars challenge vets. Consistency wins over flash. Upsets in early rounds shake draws. Heat and pace test all. Follow momentum builders. These threads make the tournament must-see. The Significance of Lifting the Norman Brookes/Daphne Akhurst Cups Winning catapults careers. Sinner or Świątek gain top ranking boosts. It cements legacies down under. The cups symbolize start-of-year triumph. Champions carry momentum all season. Mark your calendar for this epic. Tune in to catch history unfold. Who will lift the hardware? The finals await.

2026 Australian Open: Records, Results and Notable Moments

admin

-

February 8, 2026

0

2026 Australian Open: Records, Results and Notable Moments

The Australian Open in 2026 produced record attendance, a number of statistical milestones, and a women’s final that delivered the most competitive match of the fortnight. While the second week lacked sustained drama, the event still generated several notable records and storylines across the men’s and women’s draws.

Tournament organisers reported a total attendance of 1,368,043 spectators across the three-week event, surpassing the previous record of 1,218,831 set in 2025. Opening Week attendance increased significantly to 217,999, compared with 116,528 the previous year. The main draw attracted 1,150,444 fans, nearly 50,000 more than in 2025.

Across all competitions — singles, doubles, juniors, wheelchair events, qualifying and legends — 833 players from 75 countries participated in 27 separate draws.

The United States led national representation with 92 players, followed by Australia (79) and France (56).

Prize money and tournament records

The tournament also set a financial benchmark. Total prize money reached $111.5 million, representing a 16 percent increase from the previous year and the highest purse in the tournament’s history.

The 2026 edition also produced several statistical firsts in the Open Era:

The top six seeds in both the men’s and women’s singles draws reached the quarterfinals, the first time this has occurred at a Grand Slam.

In the men’s event, the top four seeds reached the semifinals, the first such occurrence in Melbourne in 14 years.

One of the defining matches of the men’s draw came in the semifinal between Carlos Alcaraz and Alexander Zverev. Their contest lasted 5 hours and 27 minutes, becoming the longest semifinal in Australian Open history and the third-longest match ever played at the tournament.

Longevity milestones

Several veteran players added longevity records to the event.

Stan Wawrinka reached the third round at age 40, becoming the oldest man to reach that stage in Melbourne since Ken Rosewall did so at age 43 in 1978.

In the women’s draw, Venus Williams competed in the main draw at 45 years old, making her the oldest woman to appear in the tournament’s singles field.

Another statistical rarity occurred in the women’s event: all four semifinalists reached that stage without dropping a set, the first time this has happened at the Australian Open in 31 years.

Women’s singles final

The most competitive match of the tournament arrived in the championship match, where Elena Rybakina defeated Aryna Sabalenka 6–4, 4–6, 6–4 in 2 hours and 18 minutes.

Rybakina trailed 0–3 in the deciding set before recovering to claim the title. The match was largely dominated by serve through the opening two sets before momentum shifted late in the third.

At 3–2 in the final set, Sabalenka missed a break opportunity on a second-serve return, after which Rybakina held serve and immediately broke in the following game. From that point the Kazakh player controlled the closing stages with improved first-serve execution.

The victory marked Rybakina’s second Grand Slam title and continued a strong run of form; she had won 20 of her previous 21 matches and moved to world No. 3 in the rankings following the tournament.

Emerging players and notable matches

Despite the highly seeded quarterfinal lineup, the women’s draw produced relatively few extended contests until the final. One of the more notable earlier matches came in a three-set encounter between Clara Tauson and Victoria Mboko.

Mboko won 7–6(5), 5–7, 6–3, recovering after Tauson saved multiple match points in the second set. Mboko’s composure in the deciding set highlighted her potential as a future contender.

Another storyline was the quarterfinal run of Iva Jovic, who recorded her first win over a top-10 opponent by defeating Jasmine Paolini. The result drew considerable attention as one of the breakthrough performances of the event.

Among the early-round upsets, 19-year-old Czech player Nikola Bartunkova defeated Belinda Bencic, handing the Swiss player her first loss of the 2026 season.

Australia had 79 players competing across the tournament.

In singles, 21 Australians entered the main draw — 11 men and 10 women — with 11 players reaching the second round, the country’s best result since 2015.

Four Australians successfully qualified for the main draw: Storm Hunter, Maddison Inglis, Jason Kubler and Dane Sweeny. It marked the first time since 1992 that four Australians advanced through qualifying in Melbourne.

Top seed among the home players was Alex de Minaur, seeded No. 6 — the highest Australian seeding at the event since Lleyton Hewitt was No. 3 in 2006. De Minaur reached the quarterfinals, matching his best result at the tournament.

In mixed doubles, John Peers and Olivia Gadecki successfully defended their title, becoming the first pair to win consecutive Australian Open mixed doubles titles since 1989 and the first Australian pairing to do so since Margaret Court and Ken Fletcher in 1964.

The junior men’s doubles final also featured Australian wildcard entrants Ymerali Ibraimi and Cooper Kose, who finished runners-up.

The tournament maintained a long-running trend: at least one Australian champion has emerged from the event every year since 2012.

The opening ceremony featured a celebration of Roger Federer, who participated in an exhibition alongside former world No. 1 players including Andre Agassi, Pat Rafter, Hewitt and Ash Barty.

Former champion Bill Bowrey, winner of the 1968 Australian Championships, was inducted into the Australian Tennis Hall of Fame, with his bronze bust unveiled at Garden Square in Melbourne Park.

A group of Australian tennis figures, including John Fitzgerald and Mark Woodforde, also gathered on Rod Laver Arena to pay tribute to the late Fred Stolle.

Legends Cup

In the Australian Open Legends Cup, Team Australia — featuring Dellacqua, Hewitt, Molik, Philippoussis, Rafter and Stosur — defeated a Rest of the World team that included Baghdatis, Safin, Haas, Hantuchova, Kerber and Petkovic. The 2026 Australian Open will be remembered primarily for its record attendance, historic seeding outcomes, and the Rybakina–Sabalenka final, which provided the tournament’s most competitive contest. While the broader draw produced fewer standout matches than expected, the event still added several statistical milestones and notable performances to the tournament’s history.

Women’s health could benefit from the private equity treatment

admin

-

January 23, 2026

0

Women’s health could benefit from the private equity treatment

Read article at FT.com

Private equity firms are rarely credited with helping to cure societal ills. But sometimes, as in the case of Blackstone and TPG’s $18bn purchase of medical technology group Hologic, buyout shops have a chance to do good and do well at the same time. Hologic is focused on women’s health, providing devices for cervical and breast cancer screening, as well as uterine health. Women generally are an underserved market, tending to receive less effective treatments and poorer care than male patients. Eliminating the gap could be worth $1tn to the global economy by 2040, McKinsey and the World Economic Forum estimated last year, much of it through recovering the seven days the average woman loses per year to ill health… Read article at FT.com